The government should appoint a “ principal education officer ” to advise ministers on seminaries policy in the same way Professor Sir Chris Whitty does for health, a new report has said.
The Foundation for Education Development( FED) also called for an independent “ public council for education ” to “ oversee the development and perpetration of a long- term plan ” for the sector.
The foundation holds regular consultations across education, championing for a 10- time plan to end incremental and short- term policymaking.
In its rearmost discussion report, the organisation said ministers should hire a principal education officer, “ who would be an expert in the field, akin to the principal medical officer or principal scientific officer ”.
They would be the most elderly government counsel on education, and would “ insure that programs and plans are given the attention and precedence they earn ”.
They could also “ help give durability and stability in the education system ”.
The principal medium officer is externally signed , but becomes a member of the elderly civil service fellow to endless clerk position.
They’ve three main liabilities furnishing independent advice on public health, recommending policy changes and acting as a go- between for government and professionals.
They also produce an periodic report on the state of public health.
New part ‘ could make public trust ’
The FED report said “ A devoted, harmonious nominee who provides guidance and oversight to education planning and policy development would insure that long- term plans aren’t derailed by political shifts.
“ This could help make trust with the public, who would have lesser confidence that plans are being developed and enforced in a thoughtful, harmonious manner. ”
The new public council would also be responsible for advising ministers “ on all crucial policy and perpetration issues, including which should be delegated by ministers to indigenous or original position, and for conducting formal review cycles to cover and estimate essential aspects of the system ”.
Such a body would offer a “ frame to inform periodic planning and budget setting, and a structure for organising public educational enterprise and programs ”.
It would correspond of leaders in education and beyond. Members “ would not represent specific education interest groups but immaculately would reflect broader experience in public and civil service, education, business, wisdom, trades and culture ”.
The report also recommended a “ forum for wide stakeholder involvement and input, akin to the NHS Assembly, to help drive ongoing dialogue about our education system and how to ameliorate it ”.
Carl Ward, the foundation’s president, said it was time to stop “ tinkering around the edges making incremental changes that do n’t make a jot of difference on the big issues and start allowing about what we want the coming elaboration of our education system to look like ”.